SCP-3939-56

Link to article: SCP-3939-56.

Module Styles

• (none)

Inline Styles

• width: 300px;

• width: 300px;

• width: 300px;

Includes

• (none)

CSS Classes

• scp-image-block

• block-right

• scp-image-caption

• story

• choices

Page Source

[[div class="scp-image-block block-right" style="width: 300px;"]]
[[image https://scp-wiki.wdfiles.com/local--files/scp-3939/scp.jpg style="width: 300px;"]]
[[div class="scp-image-caption" style="width: 300px;"]]
IMG_201802280039.JPG
[[/div]]
[[/div]]

**Item #:** SCP-3939

**Object Class:** Unclassed

**Special Containment Procedures:** Object is kept in standard pre-containment holding cell. A researcher is to be assigned to classify it as soon as possible.

**Description:** None yet available.

[[div class="story"]]
> **To:** Site Director (Site-39)
> 
> **From:** Researcher ████ ████████
> 
> Amanda,
> 
> I've just checked the original correspondence. It's absolutely SCP-3939 that I've been assigned to. Both O5-3 and O5-9 have confirmed this over the course of several emails in the past week. There's no doubt that there's an SCP-3939 in pre-containment at Site-39 — or at least, the O5s have good reason to think so.
> 
> I'd much appreciate it if you could take another look to see if you can find anything. I can cc O5-3 and O5-9 if needed.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Researcher ████ ████████

You feel a bit shitty for name dropping the O5s — even though everything you've said is true. Maybe you should have just lied and said you made a mistake. Your risk pays off, though — it works. You get a response after no more than two minutes.

> **To:** Researcher ████ ████████
> 
> **From:** Site Director (Site-39)
> 
> ████,
> 
> No need to get the O5s involved — I'll look into this immediately.
> 
> It's unreasonable to expect you to make any headway on this without information. I'd suggest you go home, get a good night's sleep, and make a strong start on this with information that I find today rather than a weak one now.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Site Director Amanda Salisbury

Overall, this is a good result. The best solution now would be to wait for more information. Make a strong start, as she puts it.

On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with a weak start which becomes a strong not-start tomorrow. You still have time today — why waste it?

[[div class="choices"]]
[https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3939/offset/19 Strong start — time to go home.]

[https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3939/offset/9 Weak start — start making headway on this without her help.]
[[/div]]

[[/div]]