Chapter 1: Introduction to Time Travel

Link to article: Chapter 1: Introduction to Time Travel.

Module Styles

• .page-rate-widget-box {
      float: right;
      margin: 5px;
      text-align: left;
      font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
      margin-left: 15px;
  }
  .book-text {
      text-align: justify;
      font-family: Georgia, serif;
      font-size: 110%;
      text-indent: 0.3em;
  }
  h2 {
      font-weight: bold;
      font-variant: small-caps;
  }
  .inset {
      float: right;
      width: 25%;
      margin: 0px;
      border-style: solid;
      border-radius: 5px;
      border-width: 2px;
      border-color: gray;
      padding: 5px;	
      margin-left: 10px;
      margin-top: 5px;
      margin-bottom: 5px;
      background: lightgoldenrodyellow;
      font-size: 90%;
  }
  .inset > p {
      margin: 0;
  }
  { counter-reset: sec; }                 
  h2 {counter-increment: sec; } 
  h2:before {content:"1."counter(sec)" "; }
  h4:after {content:" for 1."counter(sec); }

Inline Styles

• width:30%;

• width:100%;display:block;

• width:100%;display:block;margin-bottom:5px;

• max-width:100%;border:1px solid transparent;

• width:35%;

• width:100%;display:block;margin-bottom:5px;

Includes

• :scp-wiki:component:license-box [info]
• :scp-wiki:component:license-box-end [info]

CSS Classes

• book-text

• inset

• mxgraph

• inset

• inset

Page Source

[[module CSS]]
.page-rate-widget-box {
    float: right;
    margin: 5px;
    text-align: left;
    font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
    margin-left: 15px;
}
.book-text {
    text-align: justify;
    font-family: Georgia, serif;
    font-size: 110%;
    text-indent: 0.3em;
}
h2 {
    font-weight: bold;
    font-variant: small-caps;
}
.inset {
    float: right;
    width: 25%;
    margin: 0px;
    border-style: solid;
    border-radius: 5px;
    border-width: 2px;
    border-color: gray;
    padding: 5px;	
    margin-left: 10px;
    margin-top: 5px;
    margin-bottom: 5px;
    background: lightgoldenrodyellow;
    font-size: 90%;
}
.inset > p {
    margin: 0;
}
{ counter-reset: sec; }                 
h2 {counter-increment: sec; } 
h2:before {content:"1."counter(sec)" "; }
h4:after {content:" for 1."counter(sec); }
[[/module]]

[[div class="book-text"]]

[[module Rate]]

Imag­ine the fol­low­ing time travel prob­lem:

> You re­cieve a win­ning lot­tery num­ber from the fu­ture. What is the prob­a­bil­ity of win­ning the lot­tery us­ing that num­ber?

Now, one might naively as­sume the chance is 100%. But in fact, the ac­tual prob­a­bil­ity is only //slightly// bet­ter than if you guessed ran­domly, and this can be ver­i­fied ex­per­i­men­tally.

In or­der to avoid mak­ing se­ri­ous mis­takes and max­i­mize suc­cess when time trav­el­ling, it is im­por­tant to have a clear un­der­stand­ing of this and other seem­ing para­doxes that can arise, and for that we must start with the ba­sics.

++ Ca­u­sal­ity

When dis­cussing time travel, it is of­ten con­ve­nient to dis­cuss things in terms of ``al­ter­nate time­li­nes'', re­ferred to as **world lines**. While it is an open ques­tion whether other world lines are ``ac­tu­ally re­al'' in a philo­soph­i­cal sense, the con­clu­sions that can be drawn us­ing this model are con­sis­tently borne out by ex­per­i­men­tal re­sults, and it serves as a use­ful men­tal model for un­der­stand­ing time travel.

[[div class="inset" style="width:30%;"]]
[[image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Inachis_io_Lill-Jansskogen.JPG style="width:100%;display:block;"]] [[image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Cyclone_Catarina_from_the_ISS_on_March_26_2004.JPG style="width:100%;display:block;margin-bottom:5px;"]]

In the­ory, the air cur­rents from a sin­gle but­ter­fly wing beat could be­come the de­cid­ing fac­tor in a hur­ri­cane's for­ma­tion.
[[/div]]

In some cases, the pre­cise se­quence of events in a world line can be dra­mat­i­cally in­flu­enced by a cas­cade of events, start­ing with some small **pred­i­cat­ing event**. This phe­nom­e­non is re­ferred to as a **bi­fur­ca­tion**, and it is use­ful to think of a world lines as `split­ting' into two or more sep­a­rate lines.

The typ­i­cal ex­am­ple of this is the //but­ter­fly ef­fect//, ​named for the idea that due to the chaotic na­ture of weather sys­tems, a sin­gle flap of a but­ter­fly's wing could be­come the de­cid­ing fac­tor in the for­ma­tion or strength of a hur­ri­cane.

In practice, pred­i­cat­ing events are both a bless­ing and a curse: while very use­ful for mod­i­fy­ing past events, care­ful pre­cau­tions are re­quired to avoid in­ad­ver­tent changes.

Supris­ingly, it is also not un­com­mon for two or more world lines to spon­ta­neously con­verge to nearly iden­ti­cal se­quences of events. These event se­quences com­mon to mul­ti­ple world lines are re­ferred to as **at­trac­tor fields**, and it is use­ful to think of world lines as ``merg­ing to­geth­er'' into one.

A real world ex­am­ple of an at­trac­tor field is the one sur­round­ing the fall of the [[[scp-140|Dae­vites]]]. Re­gard­less of the pre­cise date, be it 500 BC or 500 AD, their fall ap­pears to lead in­evitably to the events in the Re­nais­sance pe­riod up to the pre­sent.

Clas­si­cal thought about chaotic sys­tems would lead one to be­lieve that nearly every small event, every nu­clear de­cay, pro­tein fold, or cos­mic ray, would re­sult in large-scale bi­fur­ca­tions. How­ever, in the con­text of time travel, this does not ap­pear to be the gen­eral case: a small change may trig­ger a small-scale tem­po­rary bi­fur­ca­tion, but the two world lines quickly re-con­verge. This may be thought of as a gen­er­al­iza­tion of the prin­ci­ple of least ac­tion, in as much as ``rewrit­ing his­to­ry'' can be con­sid­ered an ``ac­tion''. This idea will be ex­plained more for­mally in chap­ter 3, but this ap­prox­i­ma­tion is good enough for now.


A **time­line di­a­gram** is a way of graph­i­cally rep­re­sent­ing the dif­fer­ent types of ca­usal re­la­tion­ships that can oc­cur when time trav­el­ling. There are many dif­fer­ent ways one can draw a time­line di­a­gram; the style used in this text is one of the most com­mon styles.

Here is an ex­am­ple di­a­gram show­ing time travel be­ing used to mod­ify the past to change an un­de­sir­able event [[$E$]] and en­sure that de­sir­able event [[$E'$]] oc­curs in­stead.
    										
[[html]]
<div class="mxgraph" style="max-width:100%;border:1px solid transparent;" data-mxgraph="{&quot;highlight&quot;:&quot;#0000ff&quot;,&quot;nav&quot;:true,&quot;zoom&quot;:2,&quot;resize&quot;:true,&quot;toolbar&quot;:&quot;zoom layers lightbox&quot;,&quot;edit&quot;:&quot;_blank&quot;,&quot;xml&quot;:&quot;&lt;mxfile userAgent=\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/56.0.2924.76 Chrome/56.0.2924.76 Safari/537.36\&quot; version=\&quot;6.4.2\&quot; editor=\&quot;www.draw.io\&quot; type=\&quot;browser\&quot;&gt;&lt;diagram name=\&quot;Page-1\&quot;&gt;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&lt;/diagram&gt;&lt;/mxfile&gt;&quot;}"></div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.draw.io/js/viewer.min.js"></script>
[[/html]]

In this di­a­gram, the dou­ble bar at the left in­di­cates the be­gin­ning of a world line as it per­tains to the chart. The orig­i­nal world line is rep­re­sented with the hor­i­zon­tal line, which goes un­til [[$E$]] oc­curs. The pair of dashed lines ex­tend­ing from it cor­re­spond to the time dis­place­ments in­tended to cor­rect E. In this case the dis­place­ment we care about is on top, the bot­tom one is a re­ac­tion dis­place­ment dis­cussed in the next sec­tion. The top dis­place­ment trig­gers a pred­i­cat­ing event rep­re­sented by the split, and then the world line even­tu­ally bi­fur­cates into the sec­ond one in which [[$E'$]] oc­curs in­stead.

++++ No Ex­er­cises
----
++ Dis­place­ments

[[div class="inset"]]
The xyank is named af­ter [[[iteration-0|Dr. Thad­deus Xyank]]], who dis­cov­ered many of the the­o­ret­i­cal foun­da­tions of time travel in the 1950s and 60s.
[[/div]]

In or­der to quan­tify time travel, we mea­sure the to­tal **tem­po­ral dis­place­ment**, rep­re­sented with [[$\xi$]], to de­scribe 'how much' time travel a given event is. Tem­po­ral dis­place­ment is mea­sured in **xyanks** (ab­bre­vi­ated "Xn") equiv­a­lent to 1 kg s^^3^^. By con­ven­tion, pos­i­tive val­ues are used to rep­re­sent dis­place­ments into the fu­ture, and neg­a­tive val­ues rep­re­sent dis­place­ments into the past.

The First Law of Time Travel states that, given an ob­ject of mass [[$m$]] and the dis­place­ment in­ter­val [[$t$]] the ob­ject trav­els, the to­tal dis­place­ment is equal to the mass times the in­ter­val cubed:

[[math]]
\xi = m\; t^3
[[/math]]

For ex­am­ple, if I had an ap­pa­ra­tus ca­pa­ble of 1 µXn, it could dis­place 1 mil­ligram of mat­ter 1 sec­ond, 1 µg of mat­ter 10 sec­onds, etc.

++++ Ex­er­cises
# An 7 kg ob­ject is dis­placed by 4 Xn. Does it end up in the past or the fu­ture, and how far?
# Given a 5 kg test mass, what dis­place­ment would be needed to send it 5 min­utes into the fu­ture?
# A 62.0 kg hu­man is dis­placed 46.7 kXn at 5:00 on Mon­day, when does he ar­rive?
# //Ad­vanced// A cer­tain ob­ject starts out weigh­ing 0.450 kg. The ob­ject is re­peat­edly dis­placed 5 Xn into the fu­ture, dou­bling its mass be­tween dis­place­ments. In the limit, how far into the fu­ture will the ob­ject ul­ti­mately be dis­placed, not count­ing elapsed time be­tween dis­place­ments?
----
++ Re­ac­tion Dis­place­ments

The Sec­ond Law of Time Travel states that for any dis­place­ment, there must be an equal and op­po­site dis­place­ment, or, the sum of all dis­place­ments is zero.

[[math]]
\sum \xi = 0
[[/math]]

As a re­sult, in or­der to gen­er­ate a dis­place­ment to move some ob­ject through time, an equal and op­po­site re­ac­tion dis­place­ment is also gen­er­ated that moves some other ob­ject in the op­po­site di­rec­tion.

[[div class="inset" style="width:35%;"]]
[[image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/05/STS-134_solid_rocket_booster_segment_stacking.jpg style="width:100%;display:block;margin-bottom:5px;"]]

A 225 ton gran­ite bal­last mass used in the Chronome­ter Up­scale Nega­tion Test in Mel­borne, Aus­tralia.
[[/div]]

In cur­rent real-world ap­pli­ca­tions, the ab­solute dis­place­ment val­ues achieved are in­cred­i­bly tiny, usu­ally on the or­der of a few nanoxyanks or less. As a re­sult, com­mer­cial ap­pli­ca­tions gen­er­ally use an ap­pro­pri­ately-sized bal­last mass to limit the to­tal re­ac­tion dis­place­ment in­ter­val. In some cases the re­ac­tion dis­place­ment can even be dis­si­pated into the equip­ment or its sur­round­ings with­out need­ing a bal­last mass, how­ever for safety rea­sons this is gen­er­ally not done ex­cept at ex­tremely low dis­place­ments.

How­ever, the re­ac­tion dis­place­ment can have use­ful ap­pli­ca­tions in ob­serv­ing the re­sults of time travel: an ob­ject so dis­placed will re­main un­af­fected by the changes caused by the prin­ci­pal dis­place­ment, al­low­ing for com­par­isons across world lines. In the case of a per­son, they would be able to re­mem­ber the events of their orig­i­nal world line.

++++ Ex­er­cises
# A re­searcher dis­places an al­pha par­ti­cle (m = 6.646e-27 kg) 1 day into the past. The re­ac­tion dis­place­ment is used to re­tain the con­tents of a hard drive (m = 0.327 kg). How long must the re­searcher wait be­fore ex­am­in­ing the hard drive?
# An in­te­grated cir­cuit needs to gen­er­ate a dis­place­ment of -68.3 fXn per clock as part of its op­er­a­tions. Be­cause of the sen­si­tive na­ture of the cir­cuit, the to­tal re­ac­tion dis­place­ment time needs to be lim­ited to un­der 15.0 ps per clock. How large does the bal­last need to be?
# //Ad­vanced// In rel­a­tiv­ity, par­ti­cles that are mov­ing close to the speed of light gain ad­di­tional mass ac­cord­ing to their speed, by a fac­tor of [[$\gamma = 1 / \sqrt{1-v^2/​c^2}$]]. If a pro­ton trav­el­ling at 0.5c is dis­placed 1 year into the fu­ture, and the re­ac­tion dis­places a sec­ond pro­ton at rest, how far into the past does the sec­ond pro­ton end up?

----
++ Cur­rent Lim­i­ta­tions

The fun­da­men­tal en­ergy of dis­place­ment de­scribes the the­o­ret­i­cal limit on the amount of en­ergy re­quired to achieve a given dis­place­ment, and is ap­prox­i­mately 4.95e-21 J/​Xn. [!-- based on dis­plac­ing a 1230 kg de­lorean 30 years into the fu­ture us­ing 1.2 GW over 4.3 sec­onds ;) --] the  How­ever, mod­ern tech­niques re­quire or­ders of mag­ni­tude more en­ergy: The cur­rent best, the Tachy­onic Ion Man­ual Emis­sion and Ori­gin Uni­fi­ca­tion Trans­mit­ter (TIME­OUT) ex­per­i­ment at CERN, re­quires on the or­der of 1e20 J/​Xn! To put that into per­spec­tive, one Xn costs more than the en­tire en­ergy con­sump­tion of the planet in 2013. [!-- credit for ac­cronym to <AidenEldritch> and <Wa­ter­fire> --]

Tech­niques that func­tion at am­bi­ent con­di­tions re­quire still more en­ergy, lim­it­ing the types of tar­gets that can be used to just those that are sta­ble un­der vac­uum at cryo­genic tem­per­a­tures.

Fi­nally, no cur­rently known tech­niques are ca­pa­ble of re­li­ably dis­plac­ing a tar­get into the past in a way that keeps the tar­get in­tact - even a very small mis­match in the cal­i­bra­tion on cur­rent tech­niques will con­vert the tar­get into an as-yet-un­known form of mat­ter on dis­place­ment. For­tu­nately, this lim­i­ta­tion does not ap­pear to ap­ply to for­ward dis­place­ments.

Due to these lim­i­ta­tions, trans­port of peo­ple, ob­jects, or an­i­mals into the past is largely out of the ques­tion. How­ever, it is rel­a­tively straight­for­ward to trans­mit dig­i­tal in­for­ma­tion us­ing streams of par­ti­cles and sen­si­tive de­tec­tors. Ap­pa­ra­tus ca­pa­ble of re­ceiv­ing such streams was first de­vel­oped in 1991, plac­ing a hard cap on the ear­li­est date that one can re­li­ably send in­for­ma­tion to. Chap­ter 5 cov­ers de­tails of retro­causal trans­mis­sion schemes used for this pur­pose.

An­other im­por­tant ap­pli­ca­tion of time travel is in com­put­ing. Many newer mi­cro­proces­sors take ad­van­tage of retro­ca­usal con­nec­tions as part of their branch pre­dic­tion and cache prefetch hard­ware, en­abling much higher per­for­mance and clock speeds than be­fore. This is not with­out its lim­i­ta­tions - it is very dif­fi­cult to re­li­ably trans­mit high-en­tropy in­for­ma­tion to the past - but sig­nif­i­cant ad­vances have been made with this tech­nol­ogy. The rea­son for this lim­i­ta­tion is cov­ered in chap­ter 2, and chap­ter 6 goes into de­tail about how retro­causal con­nec­tions can be used for in­te­grated cir­cuits.

Based on trans­mis­sions re­ceived from our fu­ture, it is be­lieved that most, if not all, of these lim­i­ta­tions will even­tu­ally be over­come, but as yet noth­ing more spe­cific about time travel tech­nol­ogy has been re­ceived.

++++ No Ex­er­cises

[[/div]]
----
[[=]]
**[[[time-travel|Cover]]] | [[[time-travel-ch2|Chapter 2: Time Loops]]]**
[[/=]]

[[include :scp-wiki:component:license-box]]
=====
> **Filename:** Cyclone_Catarina_from_the_ISS_on_March_26_2004.JPG
> **Name:** Cyclone_Catarina_from_the_ISS_on_March_26_2004.JPG
> **Author:** Earth Observations Laboratory, Johnson Space Center
> **License:** Public Domain
> **Source Link:** [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cyclone_Catarina_from_the_ISS_on_March_26_2004.JPG Wikimedia Commons]

> **Filename:** Inachis_io_Lill-Jansskogen.JPG
> **Name:** Inachis_io_Lill-Jansskogen.JPG
> **Author:** Korall
> **License:** CC BY-SA 3.0
> **Source Link:** [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inachis_io_Lill-Jansskogen.JPG Wikimedia Commons]

> **Filename:** STS-134_solid_rocket_booster_segment_stacking.jpg
> **Name:** STS-134_solid_rocket_booster_segment_stacking.jpg
> **Author:** NASA/Kim Shiflett
> **License:** Public Domain
> **Source Link:** [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STS-134_solid_rocket_booster_segment_stacking.jpg Wikimedia Commons]
=====
[[include :scp-wiki:component:license-box-end]]